Skip to main content

Transaction Prevalidation Architecture

Prevalidation Overview​

Savitri Network implements a comprehensive transaction prevalidation system that performs early validation, security checks, and economic viability assessment before transactions enter the mempool. This multi-layered validation approach prevents spam, attacks, and invalid transactions from consuming network resources.

Technology Choice Rationale​

Why Multi-Layer Prevalidation​

Problem Statement: Traditional blockchains perform most validation during block execution, leading to wasted computational resources on invalid transactions and potential DoS attacks through spam transactions.

Chosen Solution: Multi-layer prevalidation with semantic analysis, economic validation, and security screening before mempool admission.

Rationale:

  • Resource Efficiency: Reject invalid transactions early, saving computational resources
  • Security: Prevent various attack vectors before they impact the network
  • Economic Protection: Ensure transactions are economically viable before processing
  • Network Health: Maintain mempool health by filtering out problematic transactions

Expected Results:

  • 80-90% reduction in invalid transaction processing
  • Improved network resilience against spam and DoS attacks
  • Better resource utilization and lower operational costs
  • Enhanced security posture through early threat detection

Why Semantic Analysis of Call Data​

Problem Statement: Simple syntactic validation fails to detect sophisticated attacks, malicious contract interactions, or economically irrational transactions that could harm the network.

Chosen Solution: Deep semantic analysis of transaction call data with pattern recognition, behavioral analysis, and economic modeling.

Rationale:

  • Attack Detection: Identify malicious patterns and attack vectors
  • Economic Validation: Ensure transactions make economic sense
  • Behavioral Analysis: Detect anomalous transaction patterns
  • Contract Security: Validate contract interaction safety

Expected Results:

  • Early detection of sophisticated attacks and exploits
  • Prevention of economically irrational transactions
  • Enhanced smart contract security
  • Reduced attack surface through behavioral analysis

Prevalidation Architecture​

Core Components​

pub struct PrevalidationEngine {
    pub syntactic_validator: SyntacticValidator,   // Basic syntax validation
    pub semantic_analyzer: SemanticAnalyzer,       // Deep semantic analysis
    pub economic_validator: EconomicValidator,      // Economic viability
    pub security_checker: SecurityChecker,          // Security screening
    pub reputation_system: ReputationSystem,       // Sender reputation
    pub metrics: PrevalidationMetrics,             // Performance metrics
    pub config: PrevalidationConfig,               // Configuration
}

pub struct PrevalidationResult {
    pub is_valid: bool,                           // Overall validity
    pub rejection_reason: Option<RejectionReason>, // Rejection reason
    pub risk_score: f64,                          // Risk assessment
    pub priority_score: f64,                      // Priority score
    pub gas_estimate: u64,                        // Gas estimate
    pub economic_score: f64,                      // Economic viability score
    pub security_flags: Vec<SecurityFlag>,        // Security concerns
}

Syntactic Validation Layer​

pub struct SyntacticValidator {
    pub max_transaction_size: usize,              // Maximum transaction size
    pub max_call_data_size: usize,                // Maximum call data size
    pub signature_validator: SignatureValidator,   // Signature validation
    pub format_checker: FormatChecker,            // Format checking
}

impl SyntacticValidator {
    pub fn validate_syntax(&self, tx: &SignedTx) -> Result<SyntacticResult, SyntacticError> {
        // 1. Basic structure validation
        self.validate_transaction_structure(tx)?;
        
        // 2. Signature validation
        self.validate_signature(tx)?;
        
        // 3. Call data format validation
        self.validate_call_data_format(&tx.call_data)?;
        
        // 4. Size constraints
        self.validate_size_constraints(tx)?;
        
        // 5. Field value ranges
        self.validate_field_ranges(tx)?;
        
        Ok(SyntacticResult {
            is_valid: true,
            gas_estimate: self.estimate_gas_usage(tx),
            format_flags: self.get_format_flags(tx),
        })
    }
    
    fn validate_signature(&self, tx: &SignedTx) -> Result<(), SyntacticError> {
        // Verify Ed25519 signature
        let message = self.serialize_transaction_for_signing(tx)?;
        
        if !verify_signature(&tx.signature, &tx.signer, &message) {
            return Err(SyntacticError::InvalidSignature);
        }
        
        // Check signature format
        if !self.is_valid_signature_format(&tx.signature) {
            return Err(SyntacticError::InvalidSignatureFormat);
        }
        
        Ok(())
    }
    
    fn validate_call_data_format(&self, call_data: &[u8]) -> Result<(), SyntacticError> {
        if call_data.len() > self.max_call_data_size {
            return Err(SyntacticError::CallDataTooLarge);
        }
        
        // Check for valid function selector (first 4 bytes)
        if call_data.len() >= 4 {
            let selector = u32::from_le_bytes([
                call_data[0], call_data[1], call_data[2], call_data[3]
            ]);
            
            if !self.is_valid_function_selector(selector) {
                return Err(SyntacticError::InvalidFunctionSelector);
            }
        }
        
        // Validate ABI encoding if present
        if call_data.len() > 4 {
            self.validate_abi_encoding(&call_data[4..])?;
        }
        
        Ok(())
    }
}

Semantic Analysis Layer​

pub struct SemanticAnalyzer {
    pub pattern_detector: PatternDetector,       // Pattern detection
    pub behavior_analyzer: BehaviorAnalyzer,     // Behavioral analysis
    pub contract_analyzer: ContractAnalyzer,     // Contract analysis
    pub economic_modeler: EconomicModeler,       // Economic modeling
}

impl SemanticAnalyzer {
    pub fn analyze_semantics(&self, tx: &SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<SemanticResult, SemanticError> {
        // 1. Pattern analysis
        let pattern_result = self.pattern_detector.analyze_patterns(tx)?;
        
        // 2. Behavioral analysis
        let behavior_result = self.behavior_analyzer.analyze_behavior(tx, state)?;
        
        // 3. Contract interaction analysis
        let contract_result = self.contract_analyzer.analyze_contract_interaction(tx, state)?;
        
        // 4. Economic modeling
        let economic_result = self.economic_modeler.model_economic_impact(tx, state)?;
        
        // 5. Combine results
        let combined_result = self.combine_analysis_results(
            pattern_result, behavior_result, contract_result, economic_result
        );
        
        Ok(combined_result)
    }
    
    fn analyze_attack_patterns(&self, tx: &SignedTx) -> Vec<AttackPattern> {
        let mut patterns = Vec::new();
        
        // Check for reentrancy patterns
        if self.detect_reentrancy_pattern(tx) {
            patterns.push(AttackPattern::Reentrancy);
        }
        
        // Check for overflow/underflow patterns
        if self.detect_arithmetic_overflow_pattern(tx) {
            patterns.push(AttackPattern::ArithmeticOverflow);
        }
        
        // Check for front-running patterns
        if self.detect_front_running_pattern(tx) {
            patterns.push(AttackPattern::FrontRunning);
        }
        
        // Check for sandwich attack patterns
        if self.detect_sandwich_attack_pattern(tx) {
            patterns.push(AttackPattern::SandwichAttack);
        }
        
        // Check for flash loan attack patterns
        if self.detect_flash_loan_attack_pattern(tx) {
            patterns.push(AttackPattern::FlashLoanAttack);
        }
        
        patterns
    }
    
    fn detect_reentrancy_pattern(&self, tx: &SignedTx) -> bool {
        // Analyze call data for reentrancy indicators
        let call_data = &tx.call_data;
        
        // Check for external calls before state changes
        if call_data.len() >= 4 {
            let selector = u32::from_le_bytes([
                call_data[0], call_data[1], call_data[2], call_data[3]
            ]);
            
            // Known reentrancy-vulnerable patterns
            match selector {
                0x095ea7b3 | // approve
                0xa9059cbb | // transfer
                0x23b872dd   // transferFrom
                => {
                    // Check if call data contains callback patterns
                    self.contains_callback_pattern(call_data)
                },
                _ => false,
            }
        } else {
            false
        }
    }
}

Economic Validation Layer​

pub struct EconomicValidator {
    pub gas_pricer: GasPricer,                 // Gas pricing
    pub fee_calculator: FeeCalculator,         // Fee calculation
    pub market_analyzer: MarketAnalyzer,       // Market analysis
    pub profitability_checker: ProfitabilityChecker, // Profitability analysis
}

impl EconomicValidator {
    pub fn validate_economics(&self, tx: &SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<EconomicResult, EconomicError> {
        // 1. Gas price validation
        let gas_price_result = self.validate_gas_price(tx, state)?;
        
        // 2. Fee sufficiency
        let fee_result = self.validate_fee_sufficiency(tx, state)?;
        
        // 3. Market impact analysis
        let market_result = self.market_analyzer.analyze_market_impact(tx, state)?;
        
        // 4. Profitability analysis
        let profit_result = self.profitability_checker.analyze_profitability(tx, state)?;
        
        // 5. Economic rationality
        let rationality_result = self.validate_economic_rationality(tx, state)?;
        
        Ok(EconomicResult {
            is_economically_viable: gas_result.is_valid && fee_result.is_valid && rationality_result.is_valid,
            gas_price: gas_price_result.gas_price,
            required_fee: fee_result.required_fee,
            market_impact: market_result.impact_score,
            profitability: profit_result.profitability_score,
            rationality_score: rationality_result.rationality_score,
            economic_flags: self.combine_economic_flags(&[gas_result, fee_result, rationality_result]),
        })
    }
    
    fn validate_economic_rationality(&self, tx: &SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<RationalityResult, EconomicError> {
        // Check for economically irrational behavior
        let sender_balance = state.get_account_balance(&tx.signer)?;
        
        // 1. Fee-to-value ratio analysis
        let fee_to_value_ratio = tx.fee as f64 / self.extract_transaction_value(tx)?;
        if fee_to_value_ratio > 0.5 {
            return Ok(RationalityResult {
                is_rational: false,
                reason: RationalityIssue::ExcessiveFeeRatio,
                score: 0.2,
            });
        }
        
        // 2. Balance sufficiency with safety margin
        let total_cost = tx.fee + self.estimate_execution_cost(tx)?;
        let safety_margin = total_cost / 10; // 10% safety margin
        
        if sender_balance < total_cost + safety_margin {
            return Ok(RationalityResult {
                is_rational: false,
                reason: RationalityIssue::InsufficientBalanceMargin,
                score: 0.1,
            });
        }
        
        // 3. Gas limit rationality
        let estimated_gas = self.estimate_gas_usage(tx)?;
        if tx.gas_limit > estimated_gas * 3 {
            return Ok(RationalityResult {
                is_rational: false,
                reason: RationalityIssue::ExcessiveGasLimit,
                score: 0.3,
            });
        }
        
        Ok(RationalityResult {
            is_rational: true,
            reason: RationalityIssue::None,
            score: 1.0,
        })
    }
}

Security Screening Layer​

pub struct SecurityChecker {
    pub attack_detector: AttackDetector,         // Attack detection
    pub aml_checker: AmlChecker,                // Anti-money laundering
    pub sanction_checker: SanctionChecker,       // Sanction screening
    pub reputation_checker: ReputationChecker,   // Reputation checking
}

impl SecurityChecker {
    pub fn perform_security_check(&self, tx: &SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<SecurityResult, SecurityError> {
        // 1. Attack detection
        let attack_result = self.attack_detector.detect_attacks(tx, state)?;
        
        // 2. AML screening
        let aml_result = self.aml_checker.screen_transaction(tx, state)?;
        
        // 3. Sanction checking
        let sanction_result = self.sanction_checker.check_sanctions(tx)?;
        
        // 4. Reputation checking
        let reputation_result = self.reputation_checker.check_reputation(&tx.signer, state)?;
        
        // 5. Combine security assessment
        let risk_score = self.calculate_overall_risk_score(&[
            &attack_result, &aml_result, &sanction_result, &reputation_result
        ]);
        
        Ok(SecurityResult {
            is_secure: risk_score < 0.7, // 70% risk threshold
            risk_score,
            attack_flags: attack_result.detected_attacks,
            aml_flags: aml_result.suspicious_patterns,
            sanction_flags: sanction_result.matches,
            reputation_score: reputation_result.score,
            security_recommendations: self.generate_security_recommendations(&risk_score),
        })
    }
    
    fn calculate_overall_risk_score(&self, results: &[&SecurityCheckResult]) -> f64 {
        let mut total_score = 0.0;
        let mut weight_sum = 0.0;
        
        // Weight different security checks
        let weights = [0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1]; // Attack, AML, Sanction, Reputation
        
        for (result, weight) in results.iter().zip(weights.iter()) {
            total_score += result.risk_score * weight;
            weight_sum += weight;
        }
        
        if weight_sum > 0.0 {
            total_score / weight_sum
        } else {
            0.0
        }
    }
}

Advanced Prevalidation Features​

Machine Learning Integration​

pub struct MlPrevalidator {
    pub model_manager: ModelManager,           // ML model management
    pub feature_extractor: FeatureExtractor,   // Feature extraction
    pub anomaly_detector: AnomalyDetector,     // Anomaly detection
    pub pattern_predictor: PatternPredictor,   // Pattern prediction
}

impl MlPrevalidator {
    pub fn ml_validate_transaction(&self, tx: &SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<MlValidationResult, MlError> {
        // 1. Extract features
        let features = self.feature_extractor.extract_features(tx, state)?;
        
        // 2. Anomaly detection
        let anomaly_score = self.anomaly_detector.detect_anomaly(&features)?;
        
        // 3. Pattern prediction
        let pattern_prediction = self.pattern_predictor.predict_pattern(&features)?;
        
        // 4. Risk assessment
        let risk_assessment = self.assess_ml_risk(&features, anomaly_score, &pattern_prediction)?;
        
        Ok(MlValidationResult {
            anomaly_score,
            predicted_pattern: pattern_prediction.pattern_type,
            confidence: pattern_prediction.confidence,
            risk_assessment,
            ml_flags: self.generate_ml_flags(&risk_assessment),
        })
    }
    
    fn extract_features(&self, tx: &SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<Vec<f64>, FeatureError> {
        let mut features = Vec::new();
        
        // Transaction features
        features.push(tx.fee as f64);
        features.push(tx.gas_limit as f64);
        features.push(tx.call_data.len() as f64);
        
        // Sender features
        let sender_account = state.get_account(&tx.signer)?;
        features.push(sender_account.balance as f64);
        features.push(sender_account.nonce as f64);
        features.push(sender_account.transaction_count as f64);
        
        // Network features
        features.push(self.get_network_gas_price()? as f64);
        features.push(self.get_network_utilization()? as f64);
        features.push(self.get_recent_block_time()? as f64);
        
        // Temporal features
        features.push(current_timestamp() as f64);
        features.push(self.get_time_of_day()? as f64);
        features.push(self.get_day_of_week()? as f64);
        
        Ok(features)
    }
}

Adaptive Threshold System​

pub struct AdaptiveThresholdSystem {
    pub threshold_manager: ThresholdManager,   // Threshold management
    pub performance_monitor: PerformanceMonitor, // Performance monitoring
    pub network_analyzer: NetworkAnalyzer,     // Network analysis
    pub adjustment_policy: AdjustmentPolicy,   // Adjustment policy
}

impl AdaptiveThresholdSystem {
    pub fn adjust_validation_thresholds(&mut self, network_conditions: &NetworkConditions) -> Result<ThresholdAdjustment, ThresholdError> {
        // 1. Analyze current performance
        let current_performance = self.performance_monitor.get_current_performance()?;
        
        // 2. Analyze network conditions
        let network_analysis = self.network_analyzer.analyze_conditions(network_conditions)?;
        
        // 3. Calculate required adjustments
        let adjustments = self.calculate_threshold_adjustments(&current_performance, &network_analysis)?;
        
        // 4. Apply adjustments
        self.threshold_manager.apply_adjustments(&adjustments)?;
        
        Ok(adjustments)
    }
    
    fn calculate_threshold_adjustments(&self, performance: &PerformanceMetrics, network: &NetworkAnalysis) -> Result<ThresholdAdjustment, ThresholdError> {
        let mut adjustments = ThresholdAdjustment::default();
        
        // Adjust rejection thresholds based on network load
        if network.utilization > 0.8 {
            // High network load - be more selective
            adjustments.risk_threshold *= 0.9;  // Lower risk tolerance
            adjustments.fee_threshold *= 1.1;   // Higher fee requirement
            adjustments.gas_threshold *= 0.95;  // Stricter gas requirements
        } else if network.utilization < 0.5 {
            // Low network load - be more permissive
            adjustments.risk_threshold *= 1.1;  // Higher risk tolerance
            adjustments.fee_threshold *= 0.9;   // Lower fee requirement
            adjustments.gas_threshold *= 1.05;  // More lenient gas requirements
        }
        
        // Adjust based on performance metrics
        if performance.rejection_rate > 0.3 {
            // Too many rejections - relax thresholds
            adjustments.risk_threshold *= 1.05;
            adjustments.fee_threshold *= 0.95;
        }
        
        if performance.false_positive_rate > 0.1 {
            // Too many false positives - adjust detection sensitivity
            adjustments.anomaly_threshold *= 1.1;
            adjustments.pattern_threshold *= 0.9;
        }
        
        Ok(adjustments)
    }
}

Performance Optimization​

Parallel Prevalidation​

pub struct ParallelPrevalidator {
    pub thread_pool: ThreadPool,                // Thread pool
    pub task_scheduler: TaskScheduler,          // Task scheduling
    pub result_aggregator: ResultAggregator,   // Result aggregation
    pub load_balancer: LoadBalancer,           // Load balancing
}

impl ParallelPrevalidator {
    pub fn validate_transaction_parallel(&self, tx: SignedTx, state: &StateDB) -> Result<PrevalidationResult, ParallelError> {
        // 1. Split validation into parallel tasks
        let syntactic_task = self.create_syntactic_task(tx.clone(), state.clone());
        let semantic_task = self.create_semantic_task(tx.clone(), state.clone());
        let economic_task = self.create_economic_task(tx.clone(), state.clone());
        let security_task = self.create_security_task(tx.clone(), state.clone());
        
        // 2. Execute tasks in parallel
        let (syntactic_result, semantic_result, economic_result, security_result) = self.thread_pool.install(|| {
            rayon::join(
                || syntactic_task.run(),
                || rayon::join(
                    || semantic_task.run(),
                    || rayon::join(
                        || economic_task.run(),
                        || security_task.run()
                    )
                )
            )
        });
        
        // 3. Aggregate results
        let aggregated_result = self.result_aggregator.aggregate_results(
            syntactic_result?,
            (semantic_result?.0, semantic_result?.1),
            (economic_result?.0, economic_result?.1),
            security_result?
        )?;
        
        Ok(aggregated_result)
    }
}

Caching System​

pub struct PrevalidationCache {
    pub result_cache: LruCache<Hash32, PrevalidationResult>, // Result cache
    pub signature_cache: LruCache<[u8; 64], bool>,          // Signature cache
    pub pattern_cache: LruCache<Vec<u8>, PatternResult>,    // Pattern cache
    pub reputation_cache: LruCache<[u8; 32], ReputationScore>, // Reputation cache
}

impl PrevalidationCache {
    pub fn get_cached_result(&mut self, tx_hash: &Hash32) -> Option<PrevalidationResult> {
        self.result_cache.get(tx_hash).cloned()
    }
    
    pub fn cache_result(&mut self, tx_hash: Hash32, result: PrevalidationResult) {
        self.result_cache.put(tx_hash, result);
    }
    
    pub fn calculate_cache_efficiency(&self) -> CacheEfficiencyMetrics {
        let total_requests = self.result_cache.hits() + self.result_cache.misses();
        
        CacheEfficiencyMetrics {
            hit_rate: if total_requests > 0 {
                self.result_cache.hits() as f64 / total_requests as f64
            } else {
                0.0
            },
            cache_size: self.result_cache.len(),
            memory_usage: self.estimate_memory_usage(),
            eviction_rate: self.calculate_eviction_rate(),
        }
    }
}

Monitoring and Metrics​

Prevalidation Performance Metrics​

pub struct PrevalidationMetrics {
    pub total_validations: u64,                 // Total validations performed
    pub rejection_rate: f64,                    // Transaction rejection rate
    pub false_positive_rate: f64,               // False positive rate
    pub average_validation_time: Duration,       // Average validation time
    pub cache_hit_rate: f64,                    // Cache hit rate
    pub ml_accuracy: f64,                       // ML model accuracy
    pub security_incidents: u64,                // Security incidents detected
    pub economic_violations: u64,                // Economic violations detected
}

impl PrevalidationMetrics {
    pub fn calculate_effectiveness_score(&self) -> f64 {
        let accuracy_weight = 0.4;
        let efficiency_weight = 0.3;
        let security_weight = 0.2;
        let economic_weight = 0.1;
        
        let accuracy_score = 1.0 - self.false_positive_rate;
        let efficiency_score = self.cache_hit_rate;
        let security_score = if self.security_incidents > 0 {
            1.0 - (self.security_incidents as f64 / self.total_validations as f64)
        } else {
            1.0
        };
        let economic_score = if self.economic_violations > 0 {
            1.0 - (self.economic_violations as f64 / self.total_validations as f64)
        } else {
            1.0
        };
        
        accuracy_weight * accuracy_score +
        efficiency_weight * efficiency_score +
        security_weight * security_score +
        economic_weight * economic_score
    }
}

Configuration​

Prevalidation Configuration​

pub struct PrevalidationConfig {
    pub validation_layers: Vec<ValidationLayer>, // Validation layers
    pub security_thresholds: SecurityThresholds, // Security thresholds
    pub economic_parameters: EconomicParameters, // Economic parameters
    pub ml_config: MlConfig,                    // ML configuration
    pub cache_config: CacheConfig,              // Cache configuration
    pub performance_config: PerformanceConfig,  // Performance configuration
}

impl Default for PrevalidationConfig {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self {
            validation_layers: vec![
                ValidationLayer::Syntactic,
                ValidationLayer::Semantic,
                ValidationLayer::Economic,
                ValidationLayer::Security,
            ],
            security_thresholds: SecurityThresholds::default(),
            economic_parameters: EconomicParameters::default(),
            ml_config: MlConfig::default(),
            cache_config: CacheConfig::default(),
            performance_config: PerformanceConfig::default(),
        }
    }
}

This prevalidation architecture provides comprehensive transaction screening with multiple validation layers, ensuring network security and efficiency while maintaining high performance through parallel processing and intelligent caching.